"Perfomance" metrics not specified about pe

[soc-pe-bot]

Team's Response

We appreciate your emphasis on the importance of specific metrics to evaluate performance, and we recognize the potential variability across different systems. However, establishing a precise threshold for metrics such as CPU usage can be complex, considering the myriad factors influencing performance. Our team would argue that the sentence refers to the overall performance of using the application, which is defined as below:

In the case of the above NFR, useful refers to being able to hold up to 1000 persons without noticeable sluggishness.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: Computer perfomance as you described it is quite vague and broadly defined. It needs to be specified how the user experience is measured in order to fuifill the requirement. Mainly, what would be noticeably sluggish? It is as you said that you need to account for the variability of systems.

---

❓ Issue severity

Team chose [severity.VeryLow]
Originally [severity.Low]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your reason]

---