It's surprisingly robust and non-lossy as it stands right now, in big part thanks to how similar flow and typescript definition files are. Please see the output in this flow-typed PR for the state of the output.
Supported? | Syntax | TypeScript | Flow |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | Void type | void |
void |
✅ | Undefined type | undefined |
void |
✅ | Unknown type | unknown |
mixed |
✅ | Symbol type | symbol |
Symbol |
Unique symbol type | unique symbol |
Symbol |
|
✅ | Object type | object |
{[key: string]: any} |
✅ | Never type | never |
empty |
✅ | Variance | interface A { readonly b: B, c: C } |
interface A { +b: B, c: C } |
✅ | Functions | (a: A, b: B) => C |
(a: A, b: B) => C |
✅ | Indexers | {[k: string]: string} |
{[k: string]: string} |
This type | (this: X, a: A, b: B) => C |
(a: A, b: B) => C |
|
Type guards | (a: X) => a is A |
(a: X) => boolean |
|
✅ | Type parameter bounds | function f<A extends string>(a:A){} |
function f<A: string>(a:A){} |
✅ | keyof X | keyof X |
$Keys<X> |
✅ | X[keyof X] | X[keyof X] |
$ElementType<X, $Keys<X>> |
✅ | Partial | Partial<X> |
$Rest<X, {}> |
✅ | Readonly | Readonly<X> |
$ReadOnly<X> |
✅ | ReadonlyArray | ReadonlyArray<X> |
$ReadOnlyArray<X> |
✅ | ReadonlySet | ReadonlySet<X> |
$ReadOnlySet<X> |
✅ | ReadonlyMap | ReadonlyMap<X, Y> |
$ReadOnlyMap<X, Y> |
✅ | Record | Record<K, T> |
{ [key: K]: T } |
Pick | Pick<T, K> |
||
Exclude | Exclude<T, U> |
||
Extract | Extract<T, U> |
||
✅ | NonNullable | NonNullable<X> |
$NonMaybeType<X> |
✅ | ReturnType | ReturnType<F> |
$Call<<R>((...args: any[]) => R) => R, F> |
InstanceType | InstanceType<X> |
||
Required | Required<X> |
||
ThisType | ThisType<X> |
||
✅ | T['string'] | T['string'] |
$PropertyType<T, k> |
✅ | T[k] | T[k] |
$ElementType<T, k> |
✅ | Mapped types | {[K in keyof Obj]: Obj[K]} |
$ObjMapi<Obj, <K>(K) => $ElementType<Obj, K>> |
Conditional types | A extends B ? C : D |
any |
|
✅ | typeof operator | typeof foo |
typeof foo |
✅ | Tuple type | [number, string] |
[number, string] |
✅ | Type alias | type A = string |
type A = string |
✅ | type/typeof import | import A from 'module' |
import type A from 'module' |
Install using npm i flowgen --save
import { compiler } from 'flowgen';
// To compile a d.ts file
const flowdef = compiler.compileDefinitionFile(filename);
// To compile a string
const flowdef = compiler.compileDefinitionString(str);
// To compile a typescript test file to JavaScript
// esTarget = ES5/ES6 etc
const testCase = compiler.compileTest(path, esTarget)
Recommended second step:
import { beautify } from 'flowgen';
// Make the definition human readable
const readableDef = beautify(generatedFlowdef);
Standard usage (will produce export.flow.js
):
npm i -g flowgen
flowgen lodash.d.ts
-o / --output-file [outputFile]: Specifies the filename of the exported file, defaults to export.flow.js
--flow-typed-format: Format output so it fits in the flow-typed repo
--compile-tests: Compile any sibling <filename>-tests.ts files found
--no-inexact: Do not mark object types as inexact (using `...`)
--no-module-exports: Convert `export = Type` only to default export, instead of `declare module.exports: Type`
--interface-records: Convert TypeScript interfaces to Exact Objects
--no-jsdoc: Ignore TypeScript JSDoc
--add-flow-header: Add `// @flow` to generated files. Should be used for libs.
Namespaces have been a big headache. What it does right now is that it splits any namespace out into prefixed global scope declarations instead. It works OK, but its not pretty and there's some drawbacks to it.
Definitions in TS and flow are often quite different, and imported types from other libraries don't usually have
a one-to-one mapping. Common cases are React.ReactElement
, React.CSSProps
etc.
This might require manual processing, or we add a set of hardcoded mutations that handle common cases.
Lodash has been one of the reference libraries i've worked with when creating the converter. The definition is mostly just a series of interfaces with the same name being re-declared over and over again for each function, which doesn't translate to flow at all. There's multiple ways of solving this but I don't have a great solution for it in place yet.
All help is appreciated. Please tweet at me if you want some help getting started, or just want to discuss ideas on how to solve the trickier parts.
git pull origin master
yarn compile
- Change the version in
package.json
git add .
- `git commit -m "New release"
npm publish
git push
flowgen's People
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.