Currently thinking about supporting mutation with a hook like:
export function useCacheMutation<Params extends Array<any>, Value>(
cache: Cache<Params, Value>,
...params: Params
): [isPending: boolean, mutate: (callback: MutationCallback) => Promise<void>] {
// ...
}Performing a mutation might look something like this then:
const [isPending, mutate] = useCacheMutation(cache, apiClient);
const save = (...params) => {
mutate(async () => {
await apiClient.save(...params);
});
};
I think that– in order for this API to correctly schedule updates with React (after a cache mutation) this package would need to change the dependencies to the experimental release channel (for unstable_getCacheForType and unstable_useCacheRefresh). Unfortunately I think that would come with the significant downside of breaking the imperative API (e.g. getValue, fetchAsync) since those are called outside of React's render cycle.
On the other hand, we could move to a context based API and store the cache maps in state for invalidation but that would require moving the fetch calls to hooks as well (so components could subscribe/unsubscribe from updates). Not sure which of these is really a good path forward.
I think it might be possible for createCache to create its own record Map (in scope) that both suspense and imperative methods could use– but still call getRecordMap from inside of fetchSuspense (to let React know that the component is "subscribed" to the cache). This feels a bit hacky but may avoid both of the above downsides.
I might need to walk back the previous thoughts RE using getCacheForType to subscribe only. I think that won't work well enough.
Maybe there's a way that I could support React updates/transitions without breaking the imperative API– by storing data in two places:
- A static map that's created once (when the cache is configured) that holds values as they are loaded or cached via the imperative
cache method.
- A React-managed map (via
getCacheForType) that holds pending requests for missing values.
This is kind of how the React DevTools suspense cache works.
inspectedElementCache uses getCacheForType to get a reference to its record map (and useCacheRefresh to clear it when a record gets invalidated). It fetches data from a second cache (below).inspectElementMutableSource is the second cache. It actually loads data from the React DevTools backend and stores loaded values in an LRU. When the backend reports that a value has changed, the LRU gets the newest value.
inspectedElementCache fetches the initial data on render, using Suspense. Then it polls inspectElementMutableSource for updates (using an interval, in an effect). If an update comes in, it schedules an update with React (using useCacheRefresh) and pre-seeds the new cache with the updated value.
- Pre-seeding the cache prevents the component from visibly suspending again, (and is kind of analogous to what the proposed
useCacheMutation hook would enable by passing a cache callback to the mutate method).
- The transition update causes a re-render, which causes the component to pull in the new cache data.
A tricky thing about the way cache invalidation works in React (useCacheRefresh) that doesn't apply to React DevTools but would apply here– is that you can't evict a single cache. Calling useCacheRefresh clears all caches. However, that's where I think the 2nd static map could come in handy. Unless a value was explicitly evicted, then re-rendering could just read from that map directly and avoid suspending.
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent