rsxix / pe Goto Github PK

When you try to add a GPA such as 7, it says that GPA must be between 0.00 and 5.00, but at the same time I can add a GPA of 3.2478 and the view does not round it off. When I compare a student with GPA 4.20001 and 4.200 it correctly shows me the first one's GPA is more. I think it might make sense to round it off automatically for them.

Furthermore, I also found disrepencies in the rounding when using the csv file. It isn't consistent.

Most of the commands were not covered and some key test cases such as add commands were not included. It's quite limiting as a means to test the application. For instance, I started with an empty list and had to navigate the UG for more test commands. The commands felt like they weren't specified to test edge cases.

Specific metrics for sluggish perfomances should be mentioned eg cpu usage as it is difficult to ascertain how to assess sluggish perfomance. This could also differ based on system.

I used the add command from the UG but instead collated and combined the two tags into one with a space in between. Instead, the error being shown is that of an incorrect grade. It would also be useful to specify this possibility ambiguity about the use of tags.

Given you are targetting yourself to professors who are less likely, I found the lack of specification on how to make a csv file to import a bit disadvantegous. You should specify what app to go into, on both mac or windows, and also include images for them to follow.

The UG makes an explicit assumption of a 5.0 GPA or a linear grading system. But in NUS alone, some majors do use a 4.0 scale

I added Amanda as shown in your UG and then took their student ID (s/A0251647W) and tried to edit another student to have the same student ID. I was thinking duplicate student IDs should not be allowed. I had already tried to test the same with add and it told me the applicant exists in the book. But when I did edit x s/A0251647W, it did not told me this but gave me a non specific invalid command format.

There are multiple cases of headings eg 7.1 High Priority that occur at the end of the page. This is perhaps something to avoid as it feels less readable. It's better to group things together.

When you do edit, it overrides your tags, but there's no functionality to add a new tag to a student.

Number 5 would be an example of a FR because it describes a specific feature that the system must have to meet the needs of its users rather than a criteria to judge the perfomance of the system.

Program hangs. But upon reopening the app, all my files are saved.

If I were to include an extra, incorrect prefix in my add command, rather than tell me to specify the correct to format it will tell me that I have used the wrong format for one of the parameters.

I viewed 2 and then deleted 2 but the view remains the same

These page breaks make it kind of tedious to read through the UG as the information isnt collated together. This is especially an issue if ur using a single view pdf or have it printed. It's better to have such things included on a new page.

I get an error saying that the student number must be a specific format when i try to add s/NONUMBER but I was able to add a student with a different format using add prior.